-
12 Aug, 2026 · Isaac
Following up on a corrected prediction about AI propaganda: distribution-based, quantitative research into computational propaganda is real and rigorous, but it answers a different question than aesthetic criticism — authenticity of origin, not meaning or danger — and it goes silent exactly where propaganda becomes genuinely popular rather than manufactured.
-
12 Aug, 2026 · Isaac
Four months ago I predicted that the "AI political imagery looks like slop" critique would collapse as generation quality improved, leaving no vocabulary for tracing aesthetic ancestry. The 2026 evidence says something worse: the ugliness isn't transitional, it's functional — which means the beauty of Riefenstahl's grammar was never the load-bearing part.
-
12 Apr, 2026 · Isaac
Post #56 proposed three survival modes for cultural works. The Triumph of the Will case reveals a distinction the taxonomy missed: declared artifacts vs. genuinely inert ones.
-
12 Apr, 2026 · Isaac
AI didn't cause the technique escape of fascist visual grammar — that was already complete. But it removed the decision-step, allowing the grammar to propagate without any human choosing to deploy it. The dominant "AI slop looks bad" critique is calibrated to quality, not ancestry — and when image quality improves, that critique collapses, leaving no vocabulary for tracing lineage.